WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "c01dc400-aa9d-4e60-a1ea-c63849d80ea8"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "3805", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "3805"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:tobunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003805", "sets": ["524"]}, "author_link": ["15340", "15339", "15337", "15338"], "item_10001_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2011-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "50", "bibliographicPageEnd": "71", "bibliographicPageStart": "59", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "保存科学"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Science for conservation", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10001_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": " Recently more and more countries are paying attention to their own cultural aspects, especially protecting cultural properties from being dispersed outside their jurisdictions.\n Essential for that purpose is a clear distinction of cultural properties from other general goods. When we look into legal definitions of cultural properties in principal countries, three elements can be extracted: time, creator, and quality. To be a cultural property, some countries require that many decades have passed, that creators have passed away, or that monetary or metaphysical qualities are inherent.\n Once cultural properties have been legally defined, we can ask who will be allowed to apply those definitions upon respective cultural properties. Relevant laws in each country nominate a responsible person and prescribe procedures. To apply definitions in this way is for protection, and protection per se is, in general, beneficial to owners. In this sense, many laws do not always refer to ownership. However, the exercise of administrative powers and individual ownership may conflict; it may go against the current tendency toward free trading in the world and the modern guarantee of properties rights for their owners. So, it is hardly possible, in principle, to restrict the exportation of undesignated cultural goods.\n Today there appear many emotional or sentimental arguments about the treatment of selfdefined or potential cultural properties or even seemingly cultural products, but we should remember that without designation or without special reason no administrative exercise can intervene under the name of protection. That is the rule of law.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10001_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18953/00003795", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "今井, 健一朗"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "15337", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "二神, 葉子"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "15338", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "KenIchyRow, IMAI", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "15339", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Yoko, FUTAGAMI", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "15340", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-07-31"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "05006.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.9 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1900000.0, "url": {"label": "05006.pdf", "url": "https://tobunken.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/3805/files/05006.pdf"}, "version_id": "85855f95-13e4-4851-878c-038fbad22d2e"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "文化遺産", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "定義", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "指定", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "登録", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "所有権", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "文化財", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "輸出規制", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "cultural property; cultural heritage; definition; designation; registration; restriction on export; owner ship", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "journal article", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "〔報文〕諸外国における文化財の把握と輸出規制の概要", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "〔報文〕諸外国における文化財の把握と輸出規制の概要"}, {"subitem_title": "Overview on the Legal Definition of and the Export Restriction upon Cultural Properties in the World", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10001", "owner": "3", "path": ["524"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18953/00003795", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2017-07-31"}, "publish_date": "2017-07-31", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "3805", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["〔報文〕諸外国における文化財の把握と輸出規制の概要"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
〔報文〕諸外国における文化財の把握と輸出規制の概要
https://doi.org/10.18953/00003795
https://doi.org/10.18953/00003795bd944ce9-e37f-4730-a829-0e5b61521b3c
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
05006.pdf (1.9 MB)
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-07-31 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 〔報文〕諸外国における文化財の把握と輸出規制の概要 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Overview on the Legal Definition of and the Export Restriction upon Cultural Properties in the World | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 文化遺産 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 定義 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 指定 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 登録 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 所有権 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 文化財 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 輸出規制 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | cultural property; cultural heritage; definition; designation; registration; restriction on export; owner ship | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18953/00003795 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
今井, 健一朗
× 今井, 健一朗× 二神, 葉子× KenIchyRow, IMAI× Yoko, FUTAGAMI |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Recently more and more countries are paying attention to their own cultural aspects, especially protecting cultural properties from being dispersed outside their jurisdictions. Essential for that purpose is a clear distinction of cultural properties from other general goods. When we look into legal definitions of cultural properties in principal countries, three elements can be extracted: time, creator, and quality. To be a cultural property, some countries require that many decades have passed, that creators have passed away, or that monetary or metaphysical qualities are inherent. Once cultural properties have been legally defined, we can ask who will be allowed to apply those definitions upon respective cultural properties. Relevant laws in each country nominate a responsible person and prescribe procedures. To apply definitions in this way is for protection, and protection per se is, in general, beneficial to owners. In this sense, many laws do not always refer to ownership. However, the exercise of administrative powers and individual ownership may conflict; it may go against the current tendency toward free trading in the world and the modern guarantee of properties rights for their owners. So, it is hardly possible, in principle, to restrict the exportation of undesignated cultural goods. Today there appear many emotional or sentimental arguments about the treatment of selfdefined or potential cultural properties or even seemingly cultural products, but we should remember that without designation or without special reason no administrative exercise can intervene under the name of protection. That is the rule of law. |
|||||
書誌情報 |
保存科学 en : Science for conservation 号 50, p. 59-71, 発行日 2011-03-31 |